Karma in the flow of oneness

The law of ‘karma’ which many in the eastern cultures strongly believe in, simply means- we reap what we sow. This is a wisdom which refers to a direct relationship between intentional actions (including thoughts, words and deeds) and their consequences. Karma literally means ‘action’ and it ties up the ethics of human volition, with the chains of causes and effects.

This philosophy attempts to restore a balance, by explaining away the unfairness and inequality prevalent in the society, while also serving as a motivation for people to always choose the right action.

The fruits of karma need time to ripen. The belief in rebirth and reincarnation in eastern cultures, extends the doctrine of karma beyond the confines of a single lifetime. If not now, then later, in another lifetime, in another setting, but we are sure to face the results of our actions!

This belief has many staunch adherents, because it convincingly explains away, the inequalities seen in the world. It can easily justify the blatant suffering of the poor, diseased, weak and vulnerable, while the powerful, healthy and rich continue to enjoy their lives, without any apparent unfairness.

Belief in karma accounts for the inequalities seen in the world, without apparent unfairness, by explaining the current situation of the privileged or deprived, as resulting from their past actions.

Under the auspices of the belief in karma, the privileged can consider their great fortunes a reward for previously performed good karma- while the needy and deprived can suffer with a consolation, that they are paying some of the debts accumulated from their previous lives, hence clearing their path towards a better future.

The fact that no one remembers anything from a previous life, does not make it seem less sensible, to the believers of either karma or reincarnation.

Now, if in reality, we are not the separate, isolated, body-mind-ego entities that we identify ourselves with, but the oneness, the isness, the wholeness of all that is- how can a belief in karma and reincarnation fit in this understanding?

If I think I am a tiny ripple in the ocean of all that is, then, my death is this ripple submerging into the water, dissolving in the ocean.  Upon my death, I disappear as a ripple, but I continue as just the water. In a short while, this same water may rise upwards as another ripple or a wave. This is my reincarnation, a rebirth!

The water in the ocean rises and falls continuously as ripples and waves, this is the death and reincarnation of a ripple, but in reality, there is only the water as the movement of the whole ocean.

Through all its forms and movements- there always was, only the water. That same water from the old ripple, is now rising as a new wave. This new wave results from the movement of the whole ocean. Now, if that old ripple happened to be a sinner- will the new ‘reincarnated’ wave suffer poor consequences due to that?

Consequences for whom?

There are two levels- the level of illusion(ripple) and the level of reality(water). We are ordinarily at the level of illusion. We see each other and ourselves as separate ripples in the ocean, but we know nothing about the whole ocean! We live and interact with each other from our isolation.

Those of us who believe in karma and reincarnation, think that we die and are reborn as a new ripple, but our karmas follow us and affect the ups and downs of our new lives, according to what good or bad we have accumulated from our previous lives.

Believing this, we assume that we carry on, life-after-life-after-life, as ignorant ripples, suffering in our own isolation, until one fine day, after much suffering, we give up striving as a ripple and suddenly, are thrown into this recognition that we are really just the water! This insight instantly frees us from the limited identity of a ripple, and makes us one with the whole ocean.

The recognition that we are just water, frees us from the limited identity of a ripple, making us one with the whole ocean. This shift in perspective is our fundamental transformation from illusion to the reality.

This fundamental shift in perspective is a transformation which liberates us from the level of illusion into the level of reality. This reality is our truth, where we are not a tiny ripple at all, but the water that permeates the whole ocean! We are still in the body of a ripple until our physical death, but that is no more our identity. We now know the water as our real self!

So, from this moment on, any good or bad deeds that the ocean (through the body of a ripple) does- are not added to the accumulated Karma of this ripple. It is free of all karma, because it is free of a ‘ripple-ego’ identification as separate from the whole.

Now, it knows that whatever happens through its ‘ripple body’, is done by the whole ocean, for the whole ocean, from the whole wisdom of reality. This enlightened ripple trusts and welcomes everything that happens, and lives as its only true reality- the water!

In this metaphor, the whole ocean of existence is full of waves that sin or are virtuous, in any given moment. Everything together though, is in perfect equilibrium of harmony and balance. Because there is no separate wave in reality, every wave, whether sinner or saint-  is only an equally unreal illusion!

No ripple can sin in isolation, if there is no ripple, separate from the ocean!

If there is an apparent sin or sinner, the ocean as a whole has sinned. If there is anything of virtue, the whole ocean has been virtuous- there can be no separate ‘karma’ accumulating for any ripple or wave. Because in reality, there is no separate ripple or wave!

Their identities as separate waves- as sinner or saint, are not real, they are only apparent. Their only reality is as water, which makes the whole ocean. Their reality is the whole of totality, the oneness of the ocean, the pure emptiness, without any ripples or waves. Sin and virtue of all the illusory ripples are dissolved and annihilated in this oneness.

Separate waves are only apparent, their reality is the water, which makes the whole ocean. From the level of illusion, there are separate ripples, but from the level of reality, there is only the water.

This is what is meant by- “nothing ever happens at the level of reality”. There is only an emptiness at the level of the absolute reality- a stillness, a silence!  This is why it is also said that all the world is an illusion (Maya).

But it is recognized as illusion, only from the level of its reality! From the level of the illusion itself, it appears quite real, and when we see it from this level, we suffer all the consequences of believing that an illusion is our reality.

Our actions arise from thoughts. Our thoughts in turn arise from the complex conditioning, the whole combination of all the influences our body-minds are subject to. The totality of everything that is, affects our body-mind and the thoughts, that we act upon, in every moment. The totality therefore, affects all our choices, whatever happens to “me” as an individual body-mind, is ultimately chosen by the whole of totality.

What happens at ‘any’ instance, does not concern an individual body-mind alone, it concerns everything, the whole totality is involved in that moment- the harmony, the balance prevails for the whole of it, all of it, the flow of oneness moves as one, in each instance.

What happens at any instance concerns everything in the whole of the totality, not an individual body-mind alone. So the rules of karma at any moment, can only act on the whole flow of oneness.

If the rules of karma work, they can only work through the whole of totality, through the oneness of the whole, because there is nothing else in reality!

So, what can be the karma of an individual body-mind and how can its fruits unfold?

It is simply impossible for any individual body-mind to incur its own private karma, for which it alone is accountable and the fruits of which it has to bear alone. That cannot happen in reality, because there is no separate individual. Besides, nothing ever happens, in reality!

Nevertheless, a body-mind living in an illusory identification with its separation, can sincerely believe in its isolation from the whole and suffer through this belief, by the sequence of causes and effects.

Until we realize our truth as oneness, recognizing, that in reality we are not a separate, isolated, helpless ‘body-mind-ego’, but the whole of totality- karma and its fruits may continue to psychologically bind us.

Does that mean we reap what we sow?

We as an individual body-mind, may or may not reap what we sow, depending on the circumstances, the chance events and the direction of the whole flow of totality. Because totality as a whole, balances everything and the good or bad are only our personal interpretations, based on our spatio-temporally conditioned viewpoints.

In general, the human body-mind and the world, follow the laws of nature, where there are predictable patterns- often operating through a complex network of causes and effects. Many of these laws of nature have been deciphered by humans, and appear to determine the general likely consequences- usually proportional to their linked causes.

Human body-mind and the world, generally experience the consequences in proportion to their actions. The imprints of good or bad actions on our psyche, may result in some corresponding fruits of karma.

When we believe in our separation, we invest in our personal doership and collect the imprints of the good and bad actions committed by our body-mind, embedded in our psyche. This separate identity of ours, suffers their consequences in at least some form. For example- often acting angry or violent, leads to misery and remorse- while an act of kindness or generosity, makes us feel happy and content. Hence the ‘karma’ appear to be bearing their fruits.

But once we recognize our truth as the whole oneness and start living from this understanding, there can be no more karma accumulating for us- apparent or real.

The body will still continue to move up or down, with the flow of the whole, as needed by the whole- but there will be no ownership of the actions performed, no residues left on the individual body-mind. Whatever happens then, will not be a reward or punishment for anything that has occurred through a specific body-mind, because it will be rooted and aligned with the absolute truth and reality.

An individual body-mind may appear to be doing active hard work, but it will be performed from the whole awareness and wisdom of the moment, without any confusion or choice and will be truly impersonal and effortless. The cause and consequence of such an action, will involve and impact the whole of totality, with no ‘personal’ karma involved.

Then, karma through any individual body-mind, merely becomes another term for the movement of the totality, the whole flow of all that is. In this flow, at any given moment, there are ripples and waves, some rising, some falling.  The karma is just a way for our whole truth and reality to express within this flow of oneness!

On recognizing our truth as the whole, there is no ownership of actions by our body-mind, then karma becomes a way of expression for our reality, a movement of the totality within the flow of oneness.

Discover more from Silence at dusk

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Comments

16 responses to “Karma in the flow of oneness”

  1. The “shift in perspective” opens the door to new ways of seeing and being in the world of the here/now. Seeing what we look at and looking at what we see helps us all along the way.

    1. Absolutely, I think a complete transformation in our outlook is only possible through a shift in perspective. It may sometimes come in more subtle ways, in small increments, not always as a sudden drastic change. Perhaps, as we learn to ‘see’ what it is, as it is- more often. Thank you Jim!

      1. I think shifts in perspective are more likely within the right kind of community, where conversation is not just a repeat of yesterday’s conversation, but an on-going opportunity for inquiry, exploration, examination, and more inquiry, where every answer leads to more questions and people are alive to wonder and imagination and possibilities. Those communities are hard to find. The easy ones to find are those that want to settle in with the comfortable answers and “leave well-enough alone.”

        All the congregations I served wanted me to tell them what they had already heard all their life. That kind of “community” is everywhere, not only in churches. No life there. Or hope for life.

        1. Very true! The words ‘communication’ and ‘community’ have the same root. The real communication is when we can go beyond words, when the words reveal more than their sum total, a meaning that is behind, the hidden essence to which they point. A real communion is when the words (that are merely a vehicle to carry the meaning) are able to truly communicate what they point towards.

          A real community is where such communication is possible- where we inspire one another to explore more, go deeper and reach that essence, behind the words. It is a feeling of joyful recognition, like when a good metaphor is really understood!

          Thank you Jim, for being part of such communication and community!

  2. Shajan Mathew Avatar
    Shajan Mathew

    It is interesting to ask why are there ripples in the first place? It would have been simpler with the stillness of calm waters! The existence of individual minds trapped in ‘maya’ is explained as the ‘lila’ (play) of the ‘brahman’ in Indian thought, but it is intriguing to think why the ultimate reality is engaging in such playful activity, pushing us hapless individuals to a life trapped in illusions. Of course such questioning is seen as meaningless because we cannot fathom the nature of ultimate reality.

    1. I think asking “why” and “ how” is quite productive in the material realm, being the approach of scientific thinking through which humans have accumulated tremendous knowledge and made immense technological progress.

      But once we cross the realm of the material and objective, we hit the boundaries of our mind and logical thinking. In this realm of the unknown and the esoteric- we may reach somewhere through intuition but not through the conceptual thinking, which works everywhere else in the physical world. Our potential being limited by our senses, we may never be able to approach the absolute reality or truth, through the same approach that we use to understand our visible, material world.

      That could be the reason that many who have claimed to explore these aspects of reality in human history, across ages and cultures, have indicated that it is supra-rational perhaps. So the “why” and “how” may never be known with certainty (except as projected concepts) or understood by our minds that have evolved to work within the limitations of the dimensions of space and time, unless we can absolutely know that the ultimate reality of “what is” is limited within these boundaries. We have no reason to believe that.

      So you are right, we may never be able to fathom the ultimate reality- through our minds. But perhaps, there is a way to know it intuitively- if it is who we are, if this reality is our reality, we must have some way to access it, because it is within us, permeating us- but likely the approach to know it is not the same as the one we use to understand the physical objective facts of our world.

  3. First Cause Avatar
    First Cause

    “….but we have no reason to assume that the ‘knower’ shares this “physicality” (with all that he knows) or his emergence is confined to this same evolutionary mechanism.”

    Ramble,

    This is a quote from a post you wrote over at Shajanm’s blog site yesterday. I do not want to assume anything so I was hoping you could elucidate further on this assessment. On the surface it implies that you might have leanings toward some type dualism regarding the “knower” since you reject physicalism or emergence.

    Thanks

    1. “you might have leanings toward some type dualism regarding the “knower” since you reject physicalism or emergence.”

      No.

      I see the ‘Knower’ as the universal consciousness, there is only one knower.
      In the manifested world of (apparent only) duality, this one consciousness knows everything, through different body-minds. The last part of my post, ”Who enjoys listening” may help you see more clearly what I mean.

      In reality there is no separate ‘knower or known’, only ‘knowing’ (I have discussed this in my post ”Perceiving reality”).

      I am as clueless as anyone else regarding the ultimate truth, but definitely feel inclined to follow my experience of ’wholeness, happiness’, rather than intellectually dissecting out the ‘mechanism’ of consciousness or awareness. My post, “Inner space of awareness” is the concept of how I operate.

      Thank you for your question!

      1. First Cause Avatar
        First Cause

        I totally grok where you’re coming from. So is it fair to surmise that your grounding ontology is idealism or at least a version of idealism? I mean, this doesn’t appear to be your grounding metaphysics based upon most of what I’ve read so far, but if you are positing universal consciousness then certainly that would place you in the idealism camp even though it appears you reject the tenet of re-incarnation.

        thanks,

        1. I avoid labels so would not say I identify with any camp, specially because my understanding is still evolving, is largely derived from my own experiments with awareness and experiences with perception (rather than intellectually analyzed through established concepts or expert opinions about the nature of reality). Here is the summary of where I am right now in my understanding:
          My experience of “I am” and knowing that “I am” is real. What I call ‘Consciousness/ Awareness’, is the ‘reality’ of my being-knowing (I am) and the ‘reality’ of all my perceiving (what is). This is regardless of what is perceived or how it is perceived. In the moment of perception, the reality of ‘perceived’ merges with the reality of ‘perceiver’ into one reality of ‘perception’ (hence ONE reality).
          This reality is one same ultimate underlying reality of ‘all that is’, hence universal (irrespective of what everything appears to be), and is not confined to, or limited by anything (otherwise it cannot be the ultimate fundamental reality of everything that is).
          Beyond this, I do not know much. I invite you to read my post “Perceiving reality” for slightly better explanation of the above.
          Thank you for exploring, I wish you the best in your own journey of self discovery!

          1. First Cause Avatar
            First Cause

            I’ve been following Shajanm’s blog as well. He hinted that his position is closer to neutral monism than any other model. I’m not sure what “closer” means, so I’m going to wait until he discloses what he means by that.

            Depending upon how it goes, maybe we can continue a discussion on either his site or yours.

            When I decided to join the fray of the wild, wild west of consciousness theories a few years back, I also started from the premise of “universal consciousness”. In theory, I could make it work with a slew of hand-waving arguments. I also realized that this premise irrevocably reduced to some form of panpsychism.

            Initially, I didn’t see panpsychism as a problem because I came up with a solid argument to overcome the so-called “combination problem”. But the biggest hurdle to overcome was how panpsychism contributed to or enhanced what we know about physics.

            Physics is the science of motion. But as a science, physics does not address the cause of motion other than the lame hypothesis of a big bang. The gaping hole in the science of physics is the hard problem of motion or what I refer to as “first cause”. I wanted a model that could not only account for motion in our material universe as understood by physics, but I also wanted a single theory that could also account for the initial cause of motion. And as a pragmatic approach to materialism, I wanted a model that could account for the novelty, diversity and complexity we observe.

            So I pulled out my pencil with a heavy duty erasure and went back to the drawing board……..

            1. I honestly do not feel inclined to indulge in the mental acrobatics to tease out the mechanism, origin and problems inherent in each of the theories of ‘consciousness’. I am very much at peace not knowing what it is, why it is or how and when it came to be. I know that I do not know much and I am long past the stage, where I would spend all my time and energy finding answers to all the unknowns of our existence.

              My stance is clear, I go by my experience, I feel my way through life, I follow my inner happiness and contentment and have found peace in floating with the flow of whatever “is”. I am very much in tune with whatever I perceive as ‘reality’, without needing to feverishly find out all the intricate details of what, why, how and to intellectually explain all its reasons and mechanism to my mind.

              My efforts if any, at this point in life- are only to drop all efforts. Not to wrestle with all the clever ideas, theories and labels explaining reality, consciousness, spirituality or science- but to simply see ‘what is’ for what it already ‘is’ in my experience, and live as best as I can with this understanding and acceptance.

              I have come to realize, I do not want to look for my truth and find affirmation for it from outside (expert authorities of science, religion, spirituality or philosophy), but would rather find it within, and follow where it takes me.

              I should also add that everyone is exploring ‘reality’ as they are inclined to, nobody’s approach is better or worse, what works for each person and helps bring them closer to their truth is very individual, but my hunch is that struggling with mind and its ideas alone will not get us there, unless we also eventually tune into the silence and stillness within.

              1. First Cause Avatar
                First Cause

                ” struggling with mind and its ideas alone will not get us there, unless we also eventually tune into the silence and stillness within.”

                I couldn’t have said it better myself Ramble…… However, since blog sites are in the public domain for the public’s consumption, what I choose to express is targeted for a wider audience of those who might be reading or participating in the blog, not just the owner of a site.

                Because you never know who or what you will run into along the way.

                Peace my friend

                1. Hi First Cause, Thank you for your kindness! You obviously have an admirable and impressive scholarly approach to a committed, fundamental, thorough exploration of these topics, and it is just that I am not interested in certain sort of discussions any more, I do not feel passionately about them. At least on this blog, I use my thoughts to serve and follow my intuition- so I may not be able to contribute anything useful, to the intellectual dissections of your ideas and the proposed models, as they might fairly deserve.

                  After communicating the same thing in my last four messages to you (including on my blog and e-mail), I felt like I had to make my position very clear, more blatantly- but if the comment on my blog was not meant for me and was intended for the visitors from the general public, I sincerely apologise for being blunt in my last comment here. Thank you for your understanding. I wish you only the very best!

  4. I appreciate and resonate with the perspective that you write from; not only in your posts, but in your gentle and thoughtful responses to comments. Thank you. Gratitude unfolding.

    1. Thank you for your kind words, I really appreciate it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *